Re: using main.c. Thanks for this. Yes, it would be good to standardize on main.c. In most packages, this makes the most sense and ensures consistency. This is the same practice we follow in JavaScript, and we only deviate where warranted.

I'll reflect the changes in the README and the examples in rcbrt too, in a follow up PR. Thanks @kgryte!

Yeah, for READMEs, we've trended to having the H1 be the alias, rather than a description (e.g., rcbrtf, rather than Reciprocal Cube Root).

And we've tried to steadily refactor examples to eventually make them more amenable to code transformation, such that we can on-the-fly convert syntax from ES5 to ES6+, so we've steadily tried normalizing conventions across examples and reduced the use of unassigned variable declarations, and if needed, juxtaposing them as closely as possible to first usage.

The replacement of round( rand(...) ) is another refactoring stemming from the days before we had implemented discrete-uniform. Opportunities such as this offer chances to "modernize" things a bit now that we have dedicated functionality.

Great. So for our future implementations too, I'll be following these transformations.